The part of Jacques Derrida’s “The Animal That Therefore I Am” that intrigued me the most were the quotes from the Bible that he included. He quoted from Gen. 1:26-28 “Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and subdue it, have authority over the fish of the sea and the birds of the heavens, every living thing that moves on earth” (7) and how man was given the job to name all the animals. But then he questions, “Who was born first, before the names? Which one saw the other come to this place so long ago? Who will have been the first occupant, and thus the master?” (7) This makes me wonder how people interpret this authority over the animals. I suppose most people use this as justification of using animals for human needs, but does it really say that? To me it seems more as if this authority is supposed to be a protective one; that humans have authority over the animals to protect them and to make sure that nothing happens to them. It reminds of the type of authority that the supreme court as over the other courts in the legal system, to keep everything in balance. And like Derrida points out, animals were here before mankind and that they were living and getting along before man made their names. Maybe there is much to learn to learn from the animals since they were able to live in peace and balance for so long without us.
In the Oxford Dictionary, it states that an animal is a “living being, endowed with life, sensation, and voluntary motion”(229). What surprises me in this definition is that it’s so careful to never actually state that humans fit into this description.
I also found it interesting that the definition of humanity implies that “kindness and tenderness” (233)are defined as distinct human traits, that humaneness is “disposition to treat human beings and animals with consideration and compassion"(232). It seems that the definition of animal disconnects humans and animals but humanity connects them back together under some kind of human trait that wants to practice kindness to all living things, not just to humans. What’s also interesting is that like humanity, the definition of compassion is not limited to humans either, it just simply states “to suffer together with, to feel pity” (237). Humans can have compassion for humans and animals.
What I am finding most interesting about Philip K. Dick’s “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” is the fact that once all the animals disappeared or are very rare, they become cherished, important, and a necessity for humans to live a happy life. What I like most is that their necessity is not for their meat or skin, but just for the sake of them being an animal.
The androids have “an intelligence greater than that of many human beings, which had no regard for animals, which possessed no ability no feel empathic joy” (32). I think that Dick is trying to say something about how humans feel that they are superior to animals because our greater intelligence but questioning if intelligence is really what makes us human. If you had to redefine animal in the setting of this book, I am sure that humans would be regarded an animal without a question and it would be positively looked at to be seen as an animal rather than an android.
Personally I feel that humans are animals. We are just a type of animal, a little more advanced but still an animal. Sometimes I even feel like I have more in common that some animals than I do with some humans.
Human and Horse. We're all made out of the same stuff.
This is from Body Worlds. A traveling display of real bodies that have been preserved and composed into different positions to show how the human body works. I saw it in Houston a few years ago.
Two animals. A slice of a cow, commonly known as steak, and slices of a human from Body Worlds.
When Jeremy Bentham makes the argument that "the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?"(245A), I feel that he makes a point that is really difficult to argue with. A human baby can not talk or reason, but yet is granted certain rights simply because it is human. Is it right to favor our own race even though there are creatures out there more advanced than a human baby and can suffer just as greatly?








